Three engineers design a modular space habitat. Engineer A earns $90 per hour, Engineer B earns $110 per hour, and Engineer C earns $130 per hour. If they work a combined total of 160 hours and the total pay is $18,400, and Engineer B worked twice as many hours as Engineer A, how many hours did Engineer C work?

Tue, 05 May 2026 05:04:26 +0000

**How Three Engineers Design a Modular Space Habitat: A Data-Driven Breakthrough** In the evolving landscape of space exploration, a growing number of professionals are redefining what it means to build beyond Earth—through modular habitat systems engineered for flexibility, safety, and scalability. The team idea of three dynamic engineers working together reflects a real-world shift toward interdisciplinary collaboration in off-world development. In one such case, three engineers—each contributing distinct expertise—developed a modular habitat framework that combines lightweight materials, sustainable life support, and rapid assembly principles. This design is gaining attention as NASA and private aerospace firms accelerate plans for lunar and Mars outposts. Yet behind the innovation lies a fascinating puzzle of workforce dynamics—especially when analyzing real-world compensation and productivity in this emerging field. **The Numbers Behind the Design: Breakdown of Time and Pay** At the core of this scenario is a compelling blend of expertise and economics: three engineers—A, B, and C—work together for a combined 160 hours. Engineer A earns $90/hour, Engineer B $110/hour, and Engineer C $130/hour. Total compensation across their combined shifts reaches $18,400. Additionally, Engineer B logged twice the hours of Engineer A—creating a data-driven insight into time allocation and value contribution. Translating these variables reveals not just a payroll puzzle, but a meaningful indicator of role efficiency and market alignment in space habitat design.